Brands partnership
By Felipe Rueda
A while ago, I was talking with a marketing director I know in Colombia’s professional audio industry. He told me his company had just received an offer to partner with one of the biggest influencers in the country. I got excited. I congratulated him and told him it sounded like a great chance to give the brand more reach and connect with a younger market. But he had been thinking it over, and in the end, he turned it down.
I asked him why. His answer changed how I think about partnerships: being ready for a collaboration like this is not only a matter of infrastructure. It also takes real analysis of whether the deal is right for the brand, even when it looks like an obvious yes.
So how does a small or mid-sized brand know when it is ready to partner with a bigger name, and when it should say no? I asked five professionals what they think, and here is what they said.
Yes: When the Partnership Creates Real Value
CEO, Yamaki SAS
“To me, partnering with another company makes sense when the partner genuinely contributes to the growth of the business, either by bringing experience in an area where our company is weak or by investing capital. If the contribution is money, the most important thing is not to lose control of decision-making, so the partner should never hold more than 49% of the company. The partner should also share a similar philosophy to ours. In our case, we would never partner with an artist, because they are the customers we sell to, and if we did, other artists would stop seeing us as their supplier and start seeing us as a competitor. I have also seen in the market that, rather than partnering with a brand, the wholesale distributor ends up buying the brand outright, and in those cases a partnership becomes difficult.”
Going back to Oswaldo’s answer, he adds a point that is easy to overlook: does the partnership really make sense if you are already strong in that market? Alliances demand real financial muscle, which small businesses often lack and even large ones sometimes do. When the marketing budget is limited, the decision has to be strategic: spend it on a major sponsorship or partnership, or on smaller actions like advertising? As Oswaldo says, the goal is to focus on where the company is weak, because that is where a partnership can unlock the brand’s real potential.
Housing & Financial Well-Being Leader
“Before entering a co-branding partnership, I would ask whether it creates meaningful value for both organizations, reaches the right audience, and strengthens the brand without compromising its identity or mission. For a small or mid-size organization, the partnership should be more than visibility, it should create measurable impact and open doors that would otherwise be difficult to reach. For example, a housing nonprofit partnering with a major financial institution or community event could expand its reach and connect more families with critical resources; if the partnership creates more demands than value or is not aligned with the mission, then it should reconsider.”
Johanna once again stresses the value this new partner will create for us. She also mentions an idea that we will come back to later: it is not enough for an alliance to give us visibility. This is one of the main points we have to think through, and be rational about, as marketers when deciding whether or not to partner with someone. In the end, the excitement of teaming up with a big company can play tricks on us when all we think about is the visibility it will bring.
Not Yet: When the Deal Is Good but the Brand Isn’t Ready
A partnership can be a good idea and still be the wrong move right now. What if the offer makes sense, but the company is not prepared for it? David Rueda, Yamaki’s marketing director, has a clear view on this.
Marketing Director, Yamaki
“A small or mid-size brand should only partner with a larger brand, artist, event, or venue when it can realistically capture the upside without stretching the business past its limits. Two criteria matter most.
First, operational capacity. If the company makes products or delivers services, it needs the infrastructure, inventory, staffing, and fulfillment to absorb a real spike in demand. A partnership that generates attention the business cannot convert is a waste of money and time, and it can damage reputation when customers or partners are left underserved.
Second, brand alignment. The partner’s audience, values, and voice should fit the company’s own positioning and language. Reach alone is not enough. If the other brand or artist speaks in a way that conflicts with how the company presents itself, the association can confuse the audience and dilute the brand rather than strengthen it.
It is better to say no when either of those conditions fails: the business cannot support the demand the partnership is likely to create, or the partner’s identity and tone are clearly out of step with the brand. In those cases, declining protects both resources and credibility.”
David’s point is that no matter how good an alliance sounds, if the organization cannot carry it, it becomes a loss. Picture a small cookie company that is offered a co-branded edition with a well-known figure in the business world. The name is impressive, but the cookie buyer is not the one following that person, so sales barely move. Meanwhile, the company has paid for new packaging design, extra ink, and a different box, and every unit now costs more to produce. Customers do not value the collaboration, yet the brand is the one carrying the extra cost. And if the partnership did work and demand spiked, the same small kitchen might not be able to keep up. In both cases, the company paid for a partnership it could not turn into income.
No: When the Terms Don’t Work for You
A no can come when you sit down to discuss the terms of how the partnership will work. Even if the other company’s image is aligned with yours and it meets every other requirement, if the partnership is not designed so that both sides benefit, it is not the right one, no matter how obvious it may sound. Why? Because large companies tend to think that simply allowing you to say you are partnering with them is benefit enough, and the whole strategy ends up designed for them to grow as a brand, much more than you. This is a scenario that plays an important role when deciding on a partnership. Jerail Fennell, who runs his own marketing agency, shows what this looks like in practice.
Founder & Managing Director, Noted Marketing
“A small or mid‑sized brand should partner up only when the bigger name gives them something they can’t get alone; access to a sharper, more engaged audience they’re ready to borrow and convert.
If the collaboration doesn’t boost visibility, credibility, or relevance in a measurable way, it’s just noise.
The moment the larger brand’s identity starts swallowing yours, that’s your sign to walk away.
It depends on what the partnership is and what it is for. For example, if a local shoe company is partnering with Adidas for a neighborhood 5K and Adidas is the sponsor then yes – great visibility for both companies. “Sign up to run, get 10% off your next purchase of adidas at X store.” Or something to that nature. Mutually beneficial for both parties. Leverage both audiences.
But if Adidas says get 10% off when you shop online it hurts the small company. The small company wouldn’t be prepared to take that hit – potiental customers wouldn’t need to support the small company to get the perk.”
Anthony offers a perspective that reinforces this point: what matters is what is left once the partnership ends. Why? A partnership can be well thought out in every other way, but if it is designed only to strengthen your image or grow your audience for as long as it lasts, it may bring you some advantages while creating a dependence on that brand to reach a new audience. If it is well designed, the small brand will be able to turn the customers it gains through the campaign into loyal customers of its own.
Brand Strategist and Marketing Educator
“For a small or mid-sized brand, the value of partnering with a larger entity should be judged by what remains after the partnership ends, not simply by the exposure it generates while it lasts. A larger partner can provide access to a bigger audience, but that access has little long-term value if the smaller brand cannot convert some of that audience into customers of its own. The two audiences should have enough in common to create natural customer crossover without placing the brands in direct competition with one another. When there is no identifiable segment of a prospective brand partner’s audience to whom the smaller brand can provide meaningful long-term value, the short-term visibility generated by the partnership may not justify pursuing it.”
Anthony’s point invites us to look at what remains when the partnership ends. And this is where Johanna’s idea strengthens it: a partnership should give you more than visibility. Visibility is good, but only as far as you can turn it into income.
The Takeaway: Readiness Decides
The decision to enter a partnership requires far more strategy than people tend to expect. When a big brand comes to us, the most natural thought is: they are bigger than me and I am smaller, so they will put me on the map, and therefore I will sign whatever they put in front of me. But a partnership can create serious revenue problems for your company if it is not strategically designed; at that point it stops being a partnership and becomes a long-term problem.
That is why Anthony’s test matters most: what is left at the end. The two companies are not merging; they are collaborating. So when the partner leaves, where does that leave you? With debt? With expectations that were never met? All of this ultimately determines the value of a partnership.
A great offer is not a reason to say yes. Being ready is.
Leave a comment